Thank you to everyone who sends money to help keep the server up and running so everybody can have a good time it is appreciated

Nash v. LSPD

Discussion in 'Court Proceedings - Archive' started by Panic, Mar 21, 2018.

  1. Panic

    Panic New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    4
    Charges: [F35] Accessory to Possession, Manufacture, or Delivery of a Controlled Substance

    Appellant: Pam Nash
    Respondent: Los Santos Police Department (LSPD)
    Arresting Officer: Knightly Badge#039 and Badge#040
    Witnesses: LSPD 039 and 040, Trevor Phillips, Iman Omari, Joshua Alexander, and Xion Skye

    Supporting Documents:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aVcv9GX20ilLXj1j-7oEjOgNU3VMcXX1kYBUFa1BNT0/edit?usp=sharing

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...Kdpa0RuktUyPViSzcLGfVOWDMg/edit#gid=749935610
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2018
  2. Ricky

    Ricky Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2017
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    62
    So just clarification would be just San Andreas (i.e. Los Santos, SA or Grapseed, San Andreas) and not include any of the California things. Also ensure that you reference San Andreas Penal Code and not California.
     
  3. Brandon Miller

    Brandon Miller Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2017
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    3
  4. Matthew

    Matthew Head of Judiciary Department of Justice

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    63
    Shhh don’t give out spoilers
     
    Brandon Miller likes this.
  5. J. Conlon

    J. Conlon Member Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2017
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    8
    Party pooper.
     
  6. Brandon Miller

    Brandon Miller Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2017
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    3
    #MillerWasJustTryingToHelp :/
     
    J. Conlon likes this.
  7. Panic

    Panic New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    4
    Arresting officers were LSPD. This occured last Thursday before the department merge. Ma'am.
     
    Geronimo likes this.
  8. Panic

    Panic New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    4
    The only referencable SA Penal code is the charge, F35 (32 PC on the forums). SAPC does not define accessory so I had to use CAPC to explain why the charge doesnt make sense or meet the burden of proof. Thanks for reading the appeal though, I was expecting that to be ignored.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2018
  9. Ricky

    Ricky Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2017
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    62
    Check Section 004 of Other Offenses.
     
  10. Panic

    Panic New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    4
    What are you referencing? Section 4 is Aiding and Abetting.
     
  11. The Marshal

    The Marshal The Shadow Ranger Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    115
    That’s our accessory charge.
     

Share This Page